Skip to content
RAZOOM is in active development right now — join the early access list
RAZOOM

One workspace for the whole problem.

A Case keeps the problem, evidence, analysis and reasons together, so you can see what supports its current outcome and revisit it when the facts change.
Conceptual illustration: one Case, “Should we expand into Poland?”, is worked through six modules — Case Workspace, Problem Graph, Evidence Ledger, Claim Graph, Analysis Workspace, Scenario Lab. Fictional counts for problem nodes, evidence and unknowns contribute to a current Case outcome.

Inside a Case.

Seven connected modules help frame the problem, test possible conclusions and keep a record of any choice made. The screens below are conceptual illustrations.
  1. 01

    Case Workspace

    Keep the problem and its context together.

    Start with the problem, its objective and its constraints. Add relevant documents, assumptions and questions so the work has a clear reference point.

    • Objective, constraints and any choice at stake stated explicitly
    • Relevant context available throughout the work
    • Clear record of what changed and why
    Concept preview
  2. 02

    Problem Graph

    See which questions depend on each other.

    Map the questions that need answering and the links between them. When a fact or assumption changes, see which conclusions need another look.

    • Subproblems linked by what depends on what
    • Critical path through the problem made visible
    • Changes propagate to dependent conclusions
    Concept preview
  3. 03

    Evidence Ledger

    Know where each fact came from.

    Store sources, data and measurements alongside notes about their reliability. Keep what the evidence says distinct from what you infer.

    • Source and reliability recorded for each item
    • Interpretations linked to the evidence behind them
    • Gaps in evidence visible at a glance
    Concept preview
  4. 04

    Claim Graph

    Follow a conclusion back to its evidence.

    Connect each conclusion or recommendation to the claims and evidence that support it. See where missing or weak support could change the Case outcome.

    • Conclusions and recommendations traceable to evidence
    • Unsupported claims flagged for review
    • Conclusions that depend on a single claim made visible
    Concept preview
  5. 05

    Analysis Workspace

    Inspect the inputs behind the result.

    Bring calculations, statistical analyses and simulations into the Case. Keep inputs and assumptions with the results so you can check or rerun the work.

    • Calculations and simulations with checkable results
    • Inputs and assumptions stated with every result
    • Re-run when evidence changes
    Concept preview
  6. 06

    Scenario Lab

    Compare outcomes when assumptions change.

    Test a choice under several plausible conditions. Identify the point at which another option becomes preferable.

    • Optimistic, expected and adverse scenarios side by side
    • Decision thresholds made explicit
    • Sensitivity to the assumptions that matter most
    Concept preview
  7. 07

    Decision Record

    Keep the decision and the reasons behind it.

    Record the choice, its supporting evidence, assumptions and unresolved objections. Use that record to revisit the decision when circumstances change.

    • Rationale and assumptions captured at decision time
    • Dissenting analysis preserved
    • Conditions that would reopen the decision
    Concept preview

Choose the depth your problem needs.

Use Quick for a bounded question, Deep for a problem that needs several analyses, or Investigation for work that depends on new evidence over time.
  • Quick

    For bounded questions.

    1. Diagnose
    2. Reason
    3. Answer

    Check that the question is clear, then work toward a direct answer with supporting reasons.

  • Deep

    For difficult problems.

    1. Decompose
    2. Research
    3. Analyze
    4. Challenge
    5. Synthesize

    Break the problem into parts, research or calculate the critical unknowns, and test the conclusion against objections.

  • Investigation

    For consequential problems that evolve over time.

    1. Living Case
    2. New evidence
    3. Re-analysis
    4. Case outcome

    Keep the Case open for new evidence, measurements or experiments, then update the analysis when they arrive.

Methods for your field.

Method Packs group the analytical tools, checks and evaluation criteria used in a particular field. Each pack adapts the work inside a Case to the problem you bring.
  • Strategy Pack

    Market entry, competitive positioning, portfolio and growth decisions.

    • Market sizing discipline
    • Competitive response modeling
    • Entry option comparison
  • Product Pack

    Pricing, prioritization, adoption and product–market fit questions.

    • Willingness-to-pay tests
    • Cannibalization analysis
    • Experiment design
  • Infrastructure Pack

    Capacity, reliability, cost and architecture trade-offs.

    • Queueing and load models
    • Failure-mode analysis
    • Capacity planning
  • Investment Pack

    Theses, valuations and the assumptions they rest on.

    • Assumption stress tests
    • Scenario-weighted valuation
    • Downside analysis

What a Method Pack can contain

  • Common problem types
  • Rules for choosing a method
  • Specialized analytical methods
  • Tools
  • Reference problems for evaluation
  • Checks for weak assumptions and conclusions
  • Criteria for assessing the result

Authoring tools for domain experts are a longer-term possibility. No Method Pack marketplace is available.

What would you work on in a Case?

Tell us about the problem, the information you have, and what you need to find out. Your early-access request helps us identify useful problems to test.